Menu

Safety Culture

valentin-salja-uksDQT8CfA8-unsplash-2

The Paradox of Ultra-Safe Aviation Systems: A Balancing Act between Safety and Progress

, ,

In aviation, the pursuit of safety is not just a priority; it’s an absolute imperative. As technology evolves, aircraft manufacturers and aviation authorities strive to implement cutting-edge safety measures to protect passengers, crew, and assets. However, the paradox of ultra-safe aviation systems emerges, raising questions about the consequences of reaching an unprecedented level of safety. In this exploration, we delve into the intricacies of this paradox, examining how an excessive focus on safety might inadvertently hinder the aviation industry’s ability to measure, analyze, and enhance its systems. The Safety Dilemma in Aviation: Aviation safety is a multi-layered endeavour encompassing stringent regulations, advanced technologies, and meticulous training. Aircraft are equipped with redundant systems, automated safety protocols, and real-time monitoring to mitigate risks and respond swiftly to potential issues. While these measures are essential, the aviation industry faces a unique challenge: the safer our aircraft become, the fewer incidents occur, leading to a need for real-world data for analysis. In striving for ultra-safety, aviation systems may find themselves in a paradoxical situation. Safety measures designed to prevent accidents and incidents might require more critical data to identify potential vulnerabilities and continuously enhance safety protocols. The Data Vacuum in Aviation: The aviation industry […]

More

pop-zebra-wp81DxKUd1E-unsplash-2

A Comparative Exploration of Safety Differently in Contrast to Safety 1 and Safety 2

, , , ,

The evolution of Safety paradigms, including Safety 1, Safety 2, and Safety Differently, reflects a dynamic understanding of risk management. In this article, we delve into the distinctive features of Safety Differently, drawing comparisons with the established frameworks of Safety 1 and Safety 2. Safety 1, rooted in traditional safety thinking, emphasises preventing adverse events through risk identification and mitigation. This approach is well-captured in James Reason’s seminal work, “Human Error,” which highlights the importance of adhering to established rules and procedures to minimise the likelihood of adverse outcomes (Reason, 1990). In Safety 1, incidents are considered deviations from the norm, and investigations focus on uncovering root causes to prevent their recurrence. The emergence of Safety 2 as a response to the limitations of Safety 1 is detailed in Erik Hollnagel’s work, particularly in “Safety-I and Safety-II: The Past and Future of Safety Management” (Hollnagel, 2014). Safety 2 recognises the role of successful adaptations in complex systems and encourages an understanding of how organisations function under varying conditions. Unlike Safety 1, Safety 2 views incidents as valuable sources of information about system dynamics, prompting a shift from focusing on failure prevention to understanding successful adaptations. Safety Differently represents a paradigm […]

More

Trust hands-fotor-20230818181844

The importance of trust

, , , ,

A project on Human Factors looked at pilot mental health with a focus on support systems offered by airlines. I pilots in Europe, North America and the Middle East were surveyed, and one of the questions asked was: ‘I feel confident that the emotional support system offered by my organisation is confidential and that my utilising it would not impact my position with the company.’ The majority (56%) of the respondents indicated that they disagreed or strongly disagreed. It may be argued that this finding in an area which should be cloaked in confidentiality highlights an underlying lack of trust inside our industry worldwide. So why does that matter? Because trust and just culture are fundamental pillars in fostering a positive safety culture, and neither can function without the other! Trust forms the foundation for open communication, collaboration, and accountability. When trust is present, employees feel empowered to speak up about safety concerns and actively engage in safety initiatives. In addition, trust fosters an environment where individuals believe in the collective commitment to safety, leading to increased transparency, effective risk mitigation, and a proactive approach to preventing accidents. A just culture builds on trust and emphasises fairness, accountability, and learning […]

More